[Mep-dev] TI OMAP
Bob McGwier
rwmcgwier at gmail.com
Sun Feb 1 11:18:15 PST 2009
My own experiments will be done using the USRP2 initially because I can
put it on the air and operate it full duplex.
Bob
Grant Hodgson wrote:
> Michelle et al
>
> GeMMA is Tx only; whilst it will indeed be the best thing since the
> electron, is it merely the fore-runner to the full uWSDR transceiver,
> which of course will be the best thing since whatever there was before
> electrons :)
>
> So to get full transceive capability you would need to connect OMAP to a
> full uWSDR, and uWSDR RF board will have the capability of supporting
> the full bandwidth for digital ATV or whatever - with some component
> changes required to get the extra I/Q bandwidth. The uWSDR back-end
> will only support I/Q sampling up to 96k samples/sec, maybe 192k
> samples/sec at a push. For higher data rates different A/D and D/A will
> be required - not sure if this is supported on the OMAP Eval board or
> the Beagleboard? If not, then some new back-end A/D & D/A processing
> will be required.
>
> regards
>
> Grant
>
>
>
>> This morning I had a quick meeting with the Baseband Underlord (Ken, no ham call - yet).
>>
>> He recommended?a TI OMAP connected to Gemma through (if needed) a custom FPGA.
>>
>> http://focus.ti.com/paramsearch/docs/parametricsearch.tsp?family=dsp§ionId=2&tabId=2218&familyId=1525¶mCriteria=no
>>
>> Thoughts, suggestions, critique?
>>
>> Does anyone already have (or have familiarity with)?a TI OMAP EVM?
>>
>> More soon,?-Michelle W5NYV
>>
>>
>> Potestatem obscuri lateris nescis.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mep-dev mailing list
> Mep-dev at uppermeadow.com
> http://uppermeadow.com/mailman/listinfo/mep-dev
>
--
(Co)Author: DttSP, Quiktrak, PowerSDR, GnuRadio
Member: ARRL, AMSAT, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,
NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC.
"It is human nature to think wisely and act in
an absurd fashion.", Anatole France.
More information about the Mep-dev
mailing list